Now that I’ve seen “Maleficent,” I feel duped. The film’s previews, with a haunting remake of “Once Upon a Dream” and Angelina Jolie with cheekbones protruding as high as her s-shaped horns, hinted at a retelling of “Sleeping Beauty” grounded in the Dark Side.
But Disney, for reasons I imagine had to do with keeping “Maleficent” firmly PG, veered away from its own 1959 animated classic in such subtle but important ways that the new film comes across as an unbelievably spun rewrite of the original. It’s as if 55 years later, the heirs to Maleficent’s estate have found someone in Hollywood to tell her story. Or “the truth” as the movie trailers want us to think.
What makes this so terrible is that Maleficent’s evil was the thing that made her most deserving of her own movie. This new film starts slow and lollygags around the middle, but Jolie and some well-done dramatic scenes make it not a complete waste.
Granted the story of Sleeping Beauty goes back centuries and there are any number of versions. But when Disney reworks its own classic and changes things on us, it’s fun to wonder where the truth lies. There’s that saying that the truth lies somewhere in the middle. A movie that felt more like the middle was what I hoped to get from “Maleficent.”
Here’s my list of the most annoying inconsistencies between “Sleeping Beauty” and “Maleficent.” I’ve not seen the older film in probably 20 years, but have used Wikipedia to confirm my memory where needed. In each case you can imagine Maleficent’s pr team attempting to set the record straight with their own version of events. (WARNING: Spoilers ahead.)
- The name of Maleficent’s pet raven changes from Diablo, Spanish for “devil,” to Diaval, a name that as far as I can tell comes from nowhere.
- It’s not she who turns into a dragon at the end, it’s Diaval, her shape-shifting familiar. While I liked the new backstory to the original’s snooping raven, the dragon transformation was the coolest and most evil aspect of Maleficent’s character. So of course it was taken out.
- Maleficent doesn’t die! She lives — I’m fucking not kidding — happily ever after alongside Princess Aurora and Prince Philip. They couldn’t try to give her some depth, some heart, and then make us feel some some sorrow when she loses her last battle.
- The curse. This one bothers me the most. Now Maleficent doesn’t doom Aurora to prick her finger AND DIE, like I vividly recall happening during my childhood, but instead to fall asleep and wait for a kiss. In the older movie, one of the fairies who hadn’t yet bestowed her gift on the baby Aurora was able to weaken Maleficent’s deadly curse. Now what does that fairy give Aurora instead? We don’t know, because it’s not shown. That’s a major hole and a clue to me that this new version maybe isn’t the most reliable.
Reviews of “Maleficent” are mixed but it’s no surprise the film’s already a success. It’s just a shame that all her evil was washed away. Well, everything except her name, which the movie makes clear was her name from birth. It’s too bad that name has now lost some of its meaning.